Thank you, sir.
I will again answer in English for the sake of my sanity and clarity.
When we look at the statistics of what happens in a theatre of operations, there are several categories you put members in once they've been exposed to trauma. They can be killed in action, and, by definition, killed in action means essentially that from the point at which any medical person touched them, vital signs were absent. They were dead from the first point of contact with the medical system.
They can be classified as died of wounds, which is a statistic you don't hear very much any more. Those are people who have succumbed to their injuries but after they started being treated by the health care system.
You can be wounded in action, and that means almost what it says: as a result of being in direct contact with an adversary, you sustained a wound. It's not necessary that it be a rifle bullet, a piece of shrapnel, or a blast. It could mean that your vehicle veered off the road, rolled over, and you had a motor vehicle accident--you're still wounded in action.
The other big category is disease and non-battle injury. Again, it's as it sounds. Either you became ill, rather than injured, or you had an injury but that injury was sustained while walking, falling in the shower, or cutting yourself with a knife in the kitchen. That would be a non-battle injury. The statistics we have are 171 wounded in action, and I don't believe that includes disease and non-battle injury.