I would just echo that.
I would not want to imply at all that we're critical that the ICRC is using discretion and that it is quiet and behind the scenes in the way it goes about the work in Afghanistan. That is its role. That is the role that plays around the world. And it is vitally important.
But that's a particular function. To extend beyond that and infer somehow that therefore the ICRC becomes an adequate overall body that is capable of safeguarding the rights of detainees in a country such as Afghanistan is just too much of a stretch. Oversight and monitoring needs to come through other means and other mechanisms. The ICRC simply is not going to be able to play that role.