I think most people were focused on the C-130. But the reality is we always recognized the need for a strategic and tactical airlift. There was never an exclusion of a strategic airlift for the sake of tactical. The Hercules is not a good strategic airlifter and the C-17 is not effectively employed as a tactical airlifter. To have one or the other doesn't make much sense. It should be a combination of capabilities.
In the capability-based planning process, strategic airlift was an absolutely critical element that was not fully satisfied. If money were no object, we would like to have lots of C-17s and lots of C-130s.