I'll very briefly answer number one and number three, and then I need a little bit more explanation on number two.
Regarding the Aurora, it is our intent here to have an ISR--an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capability in the future. The UAVs or drones, as you refer to them, are complementary to a manned system. They are not to replace the manned system. They will do certain things for us, and they do them very well, but they do not complete the range.
Among the options for Aurora that we're examining right now is a replacement aircraft with people on board, which will perform many of the functions the Aurora is performing right now. So just to relieve your thought that we're going to simply leave the job entirely to UAVs, that's not the case. UAV will be a complementary capability rather than a replacement capability.
With respect to fixed-wing search and rescue, first of all, we don't have an SOR out on the street yet. So that's one issue. The second thing is I don't believe that even in the draft or the version of the SOR that exists right now there is a minimum speed specified. I believe the document talks about the existing capability, and I believe there was a statement in there that did say up to 130 knots. After we examined that, we recognized that in fact it was referring to existing technology. The existing technology, the C-130, under certain weights actually can't fly at 130 knots. It has to fly a little faster, at 140 knots.
So in fact it wasn't a future specification; it was an explanation about what we have now, and it's strictly factual. One hundred and forty knots is in fact what the current aircraft is required to fly at under very heavy weights, but it's not a specification or a limitation. And, by the way, that SOR is not in, say, the C-17 or the Chinook or the C-130J, because we have yet to take it to a finalized state at this point in time.