I would say that we want more accountability, and I mentioned this in my speech. This is across the board. It's not only with respect to military assets; it's any and all assets.
If folks are going to subcontract behind, that's fine, but we want them to be accountable as a prime. If they subcontract a particular part of the contract to a third party and the third party is not meeting its obligations, we are making sure that the prime will be held accountable to us. We won't have to go behind the prime, which has been the case in the past, to seek redress from the third party who didn't sign a contact with us but actually signed a contract with the prime.
In our contracts, we're making sure that if the prime is not going to do 100% of the contract, that's fine, in cases where we agree it's fine. But if they're going to subcontract, then they're going to be responsible for the delivery of the services from that subcontractor.