You're the boss.
I would just like to follow up.
In this country we have a regional development program; the work is shared in the regions. You were starting to allude to that in saying that every state in the United States has a piece of the action. We're talking about taxpayers' money and the official use of taxpayers' money. Is this an appropriate way to deal with it? I imagine it is done because politicians want to see it done this way, because they represent people and they're responsible for the economic development in their provinces or their states or whatever.
It seems that misery loves company, and almost every country in the world is experiencing these cost overruns in a very inexact process of defence procurement. The only ones that really seem to be benefiting here are probably the companies designing these systems and materiel that we need to defend our soldiers or to help our soldiers do the job we ask of them.
Do you feel that all the states in the United States should be benefiting by these contracts, as we do here? How does that work, actually, in the United States?