Certainly. I was involved with the C-130J when it first came up, as I say, a decade or more ago. Perhaps what's more important is not what I might say from ten years ago but the latest report on it from the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation in the office of the Secretary of Defense. This is a report that came out in January that I'm reading from. It says:
The C-130J, in the current configuration, is not effective in performing formation airdrop missions in Instrument Meteorological Conditions where the use of Station Keeping Equipment is required. The C-130J is not effective for worldwide operations in an non-permissive threat environment. The C-130J has shortfalls in meeting user suitability requirements, due to maintainability issues.
And it goes on to explain that operational testing of the C-130J will likely continue in the U.S. past 2010 because the program has shifted to what's called spiral development.
I can make this available. It's just a two-page report, but it's perhaps more important what they're saying today than what I might say from ten years ago.