I want to understand the exact procedure involved here. Apparently, we are supporting a motion, and the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development is drafting another motion. Who has precedence? If we are holding a joint meeting, why then is a different motion on the table? It is a question of common decency. I totally agree with Mr. Bachand's contention that once again, the government appears to be orchestrating these proceedings. I have nothing personal against the Minister of International Cooperation, but we are supposed to be discussing detainees, and she is going to blather on for seven minutes about her responsibility for one of the three Ds. However, the D that interests us does not stand for development, but for detainee. It's unfortunate that we are caught in this situation.
That's the fourth D, now.
I believe, Mr. Chair, that not only is it totally unacceptable, it shows a lack of respect for that committee.