That is as far as we'll get.
I know, Mr. Coderre, it doesn't follow the motion that we put forward, but I think with the confusion and complications when the two motions didn't match, how do you accommodate that?
I understand the reason you wanted more time and fewer ministers was to focus the questioning on who you felt was relevant to the situation. I do believe that still can happen. Besides the opening statements, each party can go after whichever minister they wish. In this instance, nobody can say, well, that's somebody else's responsibility and you'll have to get them in front of you, because they will be in front of us. Hopefully that will bring to a head any questions that are asked.
There should be somebody sitting in front of us who can answer them. I believe that's what the focus and reasoning was for setting it up this way. In my mind, it will work.
Anybody else?