I wasn't going to speak to the amendment, but I will.
It sounds as if we're trying to cram everything in here and dilute it to the point where it won't have any effect.
We've covered procurement in the past, and bringing someone forward now to give a little more information isn't such a bad thing, because it is an ongoing problem. It gives us a little more information, a little more insight, from a different view.
Saying we are going to cram everybody into one hour doesn't solve any problems. It says we are going to dilute it, as I said earlier. We want to leave it open so that if there are others we want to bring forward, we can bring them as needed and use some common sense.
That is something the committee can do. It seems a little more confrontational than it used to be when I was here, but still, it doesn't mean you can't come to an agreement.