This is a friendly amendment, and I don't mind.
Just for the record, we were very specific. To say that because we have them, we don't have the alternatives, if you look at all the lists of witnesses who came out, we had all points of view. We have to remember that a report is not just based on witnesses; they are not the sole source of reference.
I believe that for the sake of the recommendation we will deposit those points of view, and I think that would be good.
I said about Colonel Drapeau that it was about the inspector general, so we don't want to expand and rewrite the report.
We want to look to their point of view, so we can have those discussions eventually, afterwards, on the recommendations. I don't see any problems there at all, and if you want to put it as a friendly amendment, I don't have any problem. I'm open to have others; it's not the issue.
Specifically, the purpose was to say that it's going to be one meeting and that's it. We don't want to expand, but as you wish. If you want to have an amendment, we'll support it. But if you want a friendly amendment, let's put it as a friendly amendment and then vote on the motion as is.