At this rate, it's sustainable, but again, if you want to push out--let's say you want to go from 300 to 400--the number of reserve soldiers behind that has to be exponentially larger, because of course it's not a one-for-one proposition anymore.
I don't have the official numbers. It may take 10 part-time soldiers to create one volunteer for a six-month or year-long engagement, as an example. It's not a one-for-one ratio, so we do need to grow the capacity of our reserve force in its numbers if we want to grow more reservists who can participate in sustained operations overseas.
At the same time, the duration of their engagement is a challenge. With the complexity of the environment we're operating in, the gap or the journey from a baseline to a deployable status is that much more demanding. So we're requiring our people to sign up earlier and for a bit longer before we deploy them, if they're going from the reserve force to the regular force to something as complicated as Afghanistan.
In Bosnia, however, our reserve force carried the load for that mission for the majority of its final years, because, again, its complexity was down and the level of time required to get from a volunteer baseline to a deployment level was less.