That is a very interesting constellation of questions, and, again, I apologize for answering in English, but I'll be more efficient this way.
Chaplains, in fact, are part of our OTSSC multidisciplinary team. It's one of our leading-edge practices that we employ pastoral counsellors in our OTSSCs as full members of the team. Even without those teams, even on the ground, the chaplains are certainly a very, very important early warning system; they have a great role to play in measuring the pulse of the unit and sounding out the people who may be having difficulty, particularly those who have spiritual beliefs. If the unit member is an atheist, you're probably not going to get at them through the chaplain, but you have other ways.
Your question on stigmatization is an interesting question. It's a very difficult nut to crack. It's not unique to the military, as there all kinds of other instances of stigmas out there in the civilian world. My vision of perfection is having a single centre on base where nobody cares why you're going to the health care centre. You can be there for a sexually transmitted disease, which has a stigma all of its own; you can be there for breast cancer, and there are some women who are sensitive about that; you can be there to have a colonoscopy, and lots of people are sensitive about that; or you can be there for mental health. We're all just there to provide health care.
In the cadre of mental health, it doesn't matter if it's an operational stress injury or PTSD or if it's just that you have a mental health burden—which is in fact more of an issue in the Canadian Forces than operational stress injury, as we have more garden-variety mental health issues than the other stuff. But moving people off-base, in fact, in a certain way, perpetuates the stigma. It may work in a large city, in terms of anonymity, but perhaps it may also not encourage people to face up to some of their issues. In a small place like Petawawa, where are you going to move? Everybody knows that one PMQ is the mental health clinic, and if they see your car parked in the driveway, they know who you are.
As for the two-beers-a-day policy, our alcohol policy is the purview of the chain of command, not me. I have my own opinion about it: being dry is a very safe approach. But if you go to a two-beer-a-day policy, you have to be sure your chain of command has an absolutely iron-clad way of enforcing it or you're in dangerous territory. You have to be willing to fire every single person on that mission if they violate it, and not care if it's the task force sergeant major or the deputy commander or the commander, or your policy has no teeth and will collapse. That's not the surgeon general's opinion, but the opinion of an experienced officer in the Canadian Forces.