It is in the chart.
As I said, it is broken down by
non-battle injuries.
So, you are correct.
If I fell off my chair and got injured and had to be sent home, I'm included in that 749.
Conversely, there are injuries sustained in battle.
So it goes from one extreme all the way to the other extreme, which is why I come back and say that it's important to look at all the categories, to get an accurate reflection of what actually happened.
When you look at it—and you're going to see it, so I'll give you a little bit more here. Take this figure: wounded in action, 280. So now the number starts becoming a little bit more crystal, a little clearer: 280 wounded in action, from an overall 749.
There were 395 non-battle injuries. I wanted to mention this when the first question was posed, but I was asked to go to the end. Nevertheless, 395 is the number of non-battle injuries.
So as you said, it is as if I had suddenly fallen off my chair.
Then you have wounded-in-action, non-battle deaths; that's another issue. I would tell you, I've been in Afghanistan for six months, and to answer your question, what is the biggest piece, the biggest piece is non-battle injuries.