There were two questions there. The first question was whether or not assessments need to be improved. Based on the discussions that I have had with Canadian Forces members and based on what I have been hearing, screening and assessments are now more systematic than they were in the past. According to what I have heard, people undergo systematic screening three to four months after they return. Should this screening be improved? I am not familiar enough with the way screenings are done, but I think that the idea of systematic screening is already a huge improvement.
The second question is whether or not we can recognize risk factors and whether they should guide us in the recruitment process. The answer is yes, but there is an ethical side to that. First of all, you must be absolutely certain of what you are saying when you identify something or other as a risk factor. In my view, not enrolling someone based on that consideration could cause ethical problems.