But one of my concerns is that sometimes it sounds like divide and conquer. I'll explain.
There is some lack of transparency or there is a perception of a problem with all the red tape. It's not just based on the clinical approach; it's just to take care of their own situation.
You spoke about Bosnia. There were some problems. There were some of our fellow troops who experienced PTSD, and there was also the issue of uranium. You had Operation Plumbbob in Nevada in 1957; they're still waiting for an answer, and they don't have it.
It's the same thing now regarding the Chicoutimi. After three and a half years, now they're going to check the content of the smoke.
All I'm trying to understand—for the benefit of our future recommendations—is that we spoke about a systemic approach. What should be the best approach to make sure that those people.... At one point, they feel so lonely, and kudos to your organization, because it's all about the follow-up.
But at the same time, if we want to settle those issues, we need to find checks and balances in the process under due diligence that will permit those individuals to see the light at the end of the tunnel. It's more than just a clinical issue. It's clear that they even have problems getting information on their own files.
And they speak to you all the time. What are they telling you about that, Major, Colonel, Cyndi, Kathy?