I think there are definitely two sets of numbers, and I will refer to Kathy afterwards.
As Mr. Ethell is indicating, from the very beginning of the Afghanistan campaign we saw a phenomenon, anecdotal but nevertheless it seemed to come out, that a lot of the peers from the 1990s who had access or services and had ceased to use them were coming back, because they were getting re-triggered. So there's that re-triggering that occurred.
As Mr. Ethell was saying, also from past conflicts, people are feeling re-triggered because it is on the news, because it is out there. So there's that.
There's the fact also is that some of the people coming back from Afghanistan now may come up with some OSI issues but may have been carrying an injury from previous deployments, and there's no way we can tell that either.
There are definitely some soldiers who will develop an OSI who have only been deployed in Afghanistan, especially the younger soldiers. Some of them may have up to two or three deployments already.
I do have some numbers of how many people have had deployments in Afghanistan who are accessing our services, but I guess I want to put that in with all these caveats, because there's no way for us to really tell.
Right now we have approximately 235 peers who have been deployed in Afghanistan, out of more than 3,000 peers. On the family side, we have almost 100 families who are accessing our services, whose partners have been deployed in Afghanistan.
I'm going to pass it on to Kathy.