I'd just like to talk about benchmarks for a minute. Obviously, the more specific the benchmark and the more fluid the environment, the more difficult it is to stick to that. What are the sort of benefits and risks of specifics, and sort of the limits of significance that we should attribute to meeting, falling short, or exceeding those kind of benchmarks in what's obviously a very fluid environment?
On April 15th, 2008. See this statement in context.