Yes, there are, and OEF operates in another part of Afghanistan, in the region that they are in. We are focused on the province of Kandahar. In the province of Kandahar, there are Americans, Brits, Dutch, and we work together as a part of NATO. In Operation Enduring Freedom, there are certain objectives that the United States has put in place in that nation. They're the biggest contributor, and it works side by side and in tandem with NATO.
As to the specifics--you were asking about air strikes and other things--those are operational questions that I can't go into, other than to say that NATO has, obviously, air forces that support fully our operations. Air strikes and any sort of civilian casualties are of huge import to us. Those things are taken into account in all of our operations. In fact, in a number of cases we have stopped operations because of the danger of potentially having civilian casualties from air strikes.
You mentioned Oxfam's report. They are one of hundreds of organizations working inside Afghanistan, so they have a view. There are all kinds of other non-governmental organizations that are talking very positively about the work that's happening. The aid on the ground, and specifically in the Kandahar province where Canada is responsible, we are seeing the effects of the delivery of those projects and the aid. The facts on the ground--and that relates to the Senlis Council report--about the security in Kandahar don't bear out what is being said in the report.
I listened to a NATO response about the report this morning, and they didn't support all of the recommendations in that report. They put forward, as I indicated earlier--