Even though we're now two and a half or three years out from when we actually started the deployments--and, again, those first complex injuries are just coming to the point where they're being released--we don't know how to allocate whether they were predominantly inside the wire or predominantly outside the wire and what kind of conditions they were presented with. The numbers we have are so small, and we never captured them by inside the wire or outside the wire so much. We wish we had better numbers and the ability to capture all that information.
But the decompression side of things is interesting. People can actually leave theatre and go to Australia for three weeks or go to Europe for three weeks and not have any decompression requirements at all, and then after the tour is over, before they come home, they have the decompression time. Now, a lot of that decompression time, I think—and this is just me saying it—is spent blowing off a lot of steam. They go there and they are freed from the constraints that are imposed by that operational theatre. They go there, and sometimes they overdo things that we tell them they shouldn't be overdoing, like alcohol and activities that are going on. A lot of times one has to say that having them do decompression there might be better than bringing them all home to Edmonton, to Whyte Avenue, or whatever, and then allowing that sort of activity to go on in kind of a party mode.
Again, you identify people who might be at high risk for drinking, and the studies all show that they're all young. So if you take that preponderance of young individuals, they generally have a higher rate of drinking to excess. And those are certainly risk factors we have identified. They're no different from any cohort of that age group, probably, that you'd be able to measure, but that is a problem.
The biggest problem we have, really, is alcohol use, the use of normal drugs, and young guys doing that sort of stuff as part of their post-deployment.