What I deal with is obviously effects of decisions. In particular, it's clear that the judgment said that the provision that allows the convening of courts was of no force and effect, so it struck down that section. The problem it has created is that there's no other section or legislative authority in the NDA that would allow that to happen.
I did mention in my opening remarks that the system has convened courts that were already convened and have gone forward. I'll give you an example of some of the challenges this has created.
In one case, the issue of choosing trial was raised by the accused, and after hearing the case, the military judge just continued on without giving a choice to the accused.
In another case, the military judge ruled at a disciplinary court martial that he had to give the right to choose the type of trial, and then terminated the proceedings. That was at a disciplinary court martial, one of our panel courts. Then when the accused chose an SCM, he terminated the proceedings and sent it back.
In another case, what the military judge chose to do as his decision was to issue a conditional stay, and he referred the case back.