I have a point for further clarification. You said that a meeting could continue with unanimous consent if it fell below reduced quorum. Is that what I understood the clerk to say?
On February 4th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On February 4th, 2009. See this statement in context.
February 4th, 2009 / 4:10 p.m.
Conservative
Laurie Hawn Conservative Edmonton Centre, AB
I have a point for further clarification. You said that a meeting could continue with unanimous consent if it fell below reduced quorum. Is that what I understood the clerk to say?
See context to find out what was said next.