Yes, this is a fair statement.
As I said earlier, we have three documented cases of flight plans being submitted in the last few years, and if I take it to 2007-08, we're talking about some 70 events, so that's not a lot.
Contrary to perhaps what was mentioned in a previous session of this committee, and I referred to it in my opening comments, you can claim the START treaty is sufficient warning, but that is not a warning. As I've said, it's after the fact. And it has nothing to do with the bilateral agreement that we have in NORAD. This is a Russian Federation and U.S. treaty. And as I've said, it's not before, it's after the fact. This is not to be considered notification, from a NORAD perspective.