That isn't why I'm asking. It isn't to be ironic. Specifically when we're in the Arctic, it's also an issue of life and death. There are some situations that we have to take care of.
There are three issues, in my book. First of all, of course, you have to understand where you are. I mean the proper environment you are living in, of course. There are some issues right there.
I agree that there is the issue of partnership, but there is an issue of governance, and the governance is as important as the knowledge of your environment. I say that because we are in a new trend of smart regulations, according to Dr. Lussier's report in the past, and our role here is to see what the best role should be for DND and what our place should be within that most important issue. There will be some collateral damage, because when everybody goes to the passage, they will have some major impact not only on our own environment but also on the way people are living there, so there is the question of who would be best for governance. That's why I think governance is equally important.
As a former cabinet minister, I see the way we're working, and of course we can have a committee, but it's a bit more than that. Should we have an agency of the north? At the official level, partnership is great, but when we have too many leaders, sometimes some issues fall through the cracks. That is the reason I was asking you that question.
How do you perceive, then, the role of DND? Is it just a tool to help you to--