I will come back to UAVs later because I have a question for Ms. Lalonde.
You talked mostly about the legal aspect, but there are many ways to approach a nation's sovereignty. First, I am surprised that, from a historical perspective, you did not mention that Inuit have occupied that land since time immemorial. That is an important argument and would be difficult to refute. I would like to hear your opinion on that in more detail.
As I was saying, there are many ways to approach sovereignty. From the scientific standpoint, for example, we are in the process of underwater mapping and observing what happens under the sea. Mainly, it has to do with the normal extension of the continental shelf. Could you tell us whether you think this is an important point of view.
There is also the military perspective, but I do not think that that is even a real issue. You mentioned interdiction, but I do not think that the Canadian Navy could do much against the American or Russian navy. I sort of want to set aside the military argument. I do not think that the Canadian Forces or the Canadian Navy measure up.
I do not know if you are aware, but the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf has just given 235,000 km2 to Norway. I would like to hear your thoughts on that. It seems that Canada, for its part, has not yet made a submission. In terms of the Arctic debate, do you think that this is the organization that will have the final say?