Corfu Channel is on navigation rights. No, it was the Anglo-Norwegian fisheries case of 1951. Corfu Channel was in 1949. It had nothing to do with that, but it is important in relation to the Northwest Passage nevertheless, on another point.
The reason I am very confident is that it was only some 20 years later--eighteen and a half years, to be exact--that Canada, after drawing the straight baselines, became party to the Convention on the Law of the Sea, so it was not by virtue of a provision of the law of the sea convention, but by virtue of customary international law. In other words, what I'm saying to you is that in 1985, when Canada drew the straight baselines, there was no right of innocent passage, and therefore after 1985, after the straight baselines were drawn, there was none either.