On your first question, you cannot determine in advance how many transits are necessary in order to say it is now an international strait and therefore that the new right of transit applies. I can only tell you—and somebody mentioned a moment ago the Corfu Channel case—there is no definition in the convention for what is a strait that's used for international navigation. The expression is used, as I have just stated.
There is only one case, the Corfu Channel case of 1949 in the International Court of Justice. In that case, over an 18-month period, there were close to 2,000 ships that put into the Port of Corfu. Those were the only ships that were counted as transits.
Now, of course this is not an area like the Port of Corfu. We're talking about a remote area, and we have to take that into account.
The Permanent Court of International Justice in 1933 in the East Greenland case did take that into account, insofar as determining what acts of occupation were sufficient, either by Denmark or Norway. In that case, Denmark won.
What I'm saying to you is that I don't know. Nobody knows how many transits are necessary. But I can tell you that over a period of 100 years, 69 transits are certainly not sufficient.