Okay. He's really, in my humble opinion, the authority on the question.
I will limit myself simply to saying this. We have two problems. We have a problem, of course, an old problem, of lateral delimitation—that is, with our neighbouring states. We in Canada have one problem with the United States through Alaska in the Beaufort Sea, and we tried to settle that in 1984 and 1985 by negotiations. We had four maritime boundary problems with the United States, and we tried to settle the four of them during about a year and a half of negotiations. We didn't succeed, so we went to court on the Gulf of Maine and we left the other three. They're still there, and that's one of them.
The second problem of lateral delimitation we have of course is with Denmark--that is, Greenland. We did arrive in 1974 at a continental shelf delimitation, up to Lincoln Sea, and we left a little gap in the line. The reason for the little gap is because there is a big rock right in the middle of the medium line that is called Hans Island, named after Hans Hendrik, a Greenlander who was on an expedition as part of the expedition of the American Elisha Kane, who was an American explorer. It was Kane—and you have Kane Basin—who named the island after Hans Hendrik.
In any event, that's not a serious problem, and that's why I said a moment ago that we have no sovereignty problem, properly so-called, it's so minor.
In any event, and so far as—