Absolutely. This is exactly the way I see it. We don't need to militarize the Arctic at this stage. We're not looking for an invasion tomorrow or whatever. In my mind, it's important at this stage to combine the expertise of the coast guard and the expertise of DND to bring our military capability in the Arctic up to speed and to bring it up to the conditions there.
I'll give you an example. We were talking about those choking points where we could install listening devices to know what kind of submarine or underwater traffic is taking place. At this time, there is some development in Gascoyne Inlet in Lancaster Sound, and the coast guard is providing DND with support for that deployment. DND couldn't do it themselves, because they need to have access to the sea, the offshore working capability, which only the coast guard can provide them with at this time.
There are all kinds of examples like that. Whatever we develop with DND in the Arctic, it should be meshed with the expertise of the coast guard. I wouldn't go as far as to say that the coast guard should become integrated into DND, though, because if you look at the American coast guard, which is integrated into the army, the result is not very satisfactory.