I'm not as critical as you are of the Arctic offshore patrol vessels. It could be a versatile platform if it's coupled with a recapitalized coast guard and the Nanisivik facility. I have questions about the Nanisivik facility, but about the location. I think Lancaster Sound is actually a prime location, particularly with this federally owned infrastructure that we can piggyback on to make it more cost effective. It will add important civilian applications, particularly for the coast guard.
I think the big question is this: what infrastructure is required to support future activities in the region? Should this be a limited docking site, berthing facility, and refueling site, or should it be expanded with runways and air force operating locations so that it can support Globemaster operations? I think the government has to provide more clarity on its logistics needs before it completes its plans in 2010.
As for southern-based forces, this is a debate that's been going on since the 1940s about whether or not we can station forces in the north. At this time, given the military threats we're facing, it's probably most cost effective and proportionate to the threats to keep our primary reserve and regular units to the south while giving more attention to the Canadian Rangers.