Well, this is one way international law tends to work in our favour. Basically, once the law is written, everything stops. I mean, international lawyers have a little bit of this conceit that when they have figured the problem out, that basically stops time. I'm being a little bit facetious here, being married to a lawyer.
The reality is that the Canadian Arctic will remain the major ice cover for probably the foreseeable future. As the ice cap itself breaks up and melts, that ice is going to end up in the archipelago, basically because of the Beaufort gyro and the effect of Greenland. So we probably will be able to make our arguments and then have them supported in that regard, in my view.