There are two approaches to that. If we were to add additional resources, that wouldn't have much impact on the south, but it would have a significant impact on the costs associated with SAR. It's not inexpensive to establish a 24 and 7 operation given the training requirement and the crewing requirement.
If we're looking, instead, to move a base from south to north, then what you'll find is that the aircraft stationed in the north will be going longer distances to the south to respond to the same incidents that they are now capable of responding to. That's the fundamental premise for our basing: where we can get the most response to the most incidents in the least amount of flying time. It would increase the transit time in a number of incidents, more so than the ones that would be shortened.
If you look at the Arctic, there's no real good place that speaks to a logical place, because, if you notice, the dot plot puts it throughout the Arctic.