We're not biased against any one department as long as we can have a meaningful relationship with a federal government department that's really respecting our wishes. I think with INAC, it's more related to the human dimension, which we often talk about, whereas Defence would be more in terms of the military. We do have our northern Rangers who are very active, and we're very supportive of the fact that they got more support for what they do for the military in the Arctic. I think that was a very important announcement, where our northern Rangers are going to have increased support. That part of it is also tied to their ability to bring an income to their families, so any kind of job is always very good for us.
I don't really have a strong view about which department we would prefer to work with. I think the federal government as a whole has a fiduciary responsibility and has signed these land claims agreements. Many departments are part of those agreements and need to be more engaged in how we implement these agreements. I think that's really the bottom line; more than one department has to look at how we implement these agreements. They need to be engaged in the process and not just have junior representatives in committee meetings and in discussions that we've had. We want it to be at a more senior level where the decisions can be made.