It's a very good question, one that I would say many departments within the government are trying to wrestle out. I guess you have to look at the groups that are interested in what happens in the Arctic. I'm talking about Transport Canada, Environment Canada, the Department of National Defence, and probably several more that escape me. It's a matter of one taking primacy and using the others as deputy organizations.
It's a very good question. I think the answer would be to have one group that is appointed to form a special committee of these varying groups, which would sit together and decide on what is required to be done in the Arctic for vessels entering there.
On your point about the cruise ship, I'm not really familiar with that one. I know the one that sank in the Antarctic, which is outside the scope of this question. They were lucky; they were rescued because there was another vessel there. If you look at our Arctic, a small cruise ship or a vessel of opportunity that's moving into this area to either take something out or back to the cruise ship story, it is distance and presence that are going to be required, whether it be the facility in Nanisivik, whether it be another facility that's primarily dedicated to only search and rescue in some other part of the Arctic, so that it can at least get to where the issue is.
I think whatever body would be created, this organization, whether it be Transport Canada, a naval Transport Canada that deals primarily with Arctic issues, I think it would be tasked with having to identify this problem: where do we place our resources?