Thank you for that question.
ITK has said before this committee, and publicly in other places, that it believes the federal government's current northern strategy should be a genuine Arctic strategy that includes all four Inuit regions, including Nunatsiavut in northern Labrador and Nunavik. I think ITK has also made the point that it's very important that an Arctic strategy have a great marine emphasis, as well as reference to land areas within the territories. In addition to all four Inuit regions being included, it's important that the strategy pay proper attention to marine issues. A lot of the difficult issues in relation to sovereignty and environmental protection are marine issues, and it's appropriate to have that focus.
The other point ITK has made is that an Arctic strategy that will be durable should be written in active partnership with Inuit, and not just by federal officials.
On where other Inuit organizations stand on that, Nunavut Tunngavik is a member of ITK, so I believe they endorse that position. QIA is a region within Nunavut, so you're going down the ladder in the structuring of Inuit organizations, but I'm not aware that QIA would have any difficulty with that.
I believe you're going to be hearing further from Makivik Corporation, and I'm sure they will make the same point.