Sir, let me answer you in English, because it is important that I choose my words carefully.
I do not agree that the senior staff of the Canadian Forces, the leadership of the Canadian Forces, are focused on resilience or on the concept you're describing, for the reasons you attributed. The leadership of the Canadian Forces is very interested in having a Canadian Forces that's fundamentally ready to undertake operations in every sense of that word, and that means they have to be confident in what they're doing. They have to have a certain esprit de corps. They have to have confidence in their training, in their leadership, and yes, that could be construed as perhaps leading them into a bit of a sense of denial about what they might be facing. But I don't believe it goes that far, and it's certainly not because they want to deny the extent of problems when they occur.
You mention resilience. It's a wonderful concept. We would all like to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder. Unfortunately, if you read the scientific literature carefully, there is not even an accepted definition of resilience, much less anything you could measure in order to conduct a scientific study to say which interventions might promote resilience and which might not. As far as we know right now, the best we can do is to encourage tough realistic training with the same group of people they're going over with, to build confidence in the team.
I'm a bit sensitive to your point about not necessarily believing the rosy picture I've painted for you about the state of care in our clinics. You might be interested to know that Accreditation Canada, which is the national body that looks at the quality of care in hospitals and clinics across Canada, visited the Ottawa clinic over the past two and a half days. I was present at their debriefing this afternoon at which they praised the mental health clinic for outstanding work—one of the best mental health clinics they had ever visited.