It's a short question, and it's following up from my colleague Claude.
There's a way to protect quality of life and make sure that nothing falls through the cracks, and that's to provide status to the ombudsman.
Do you believe, as in some countries, in having an inspector general with some specific judicial power? We can talk about procurement, but there's also the angle of quality of life for the troops--like in the United States. I personally believe that we should appoint an inspector general. We can have all the recommendations we want, but when you don't even have the central data, recommendations are not sufficient. Do you believe that kind of position would add value to the system as a whole?