If we take the example of the Olympics, it's quite reasonable to think that you need some reservists to be on full-time duty for this specific operation. This is one of the roles of the reserves, to conduct or to be part of domestic operations, but again this is a matter of proportion and a matter of duration.
I guess the figure of 14,000 reservists being fully employed is not related solely to the Olympics, but it will be the number of full-time personnel in all the areas of the functioning of the army. I don't know where they will find 14,000 full-time reservists, maybe on the shelf somewhere, but I guess this is the total number of full-time reservists.
I don't know, either, the duration that those persons will be full-time for this operation of the Olympics. If it is a month, two months, three months, that's okay. I guess the reserves can do that.
You also asked if the reserves will survive the Afghanistan commitment. I guess so, but what we want to raise is that not only for Afghanistan but for all those operations that Canada has to take, either in the country or outside, using too many reservists is changing the philosophy of the militia. What we want to raise is that it should be a decision made by the elected people like you and not taken by the back door by only DND or the staff. This is why we tried to raise the question before you, so that you can be able to make the right decision for the Canadian people and not be faced with the fact that you have not heard about it and it came by the back door.