To start with, I will not comment on the official comments made here in Canada. I would rather draw your attention once again to the fact that since this particular flight incident took place in the very vicinity of two states, and we haven't had any comments or reaction, either official statements or from the public, from the States, it speaks for itself. That's point number one.
Second, I imagine there is yet another grey zone--the problem of interoperability of different international and national legislations, while mentioning those self-declared air defence identification zones that several countries have, like the States, Canada, Australia, and Japan. From the Canadian perspective, as far as I can understand, the limit of this zone is up to 300 kilometres, if I'm not mistaken, but you should consult your own military; I'm not an expert. But it definitely stretches over the region where this particular incident--or episode, to be more precise--took place.
So from the point of international law, absolutely nothing happened. It's pretty much the same thing as happened when American or NATO aircraft flew along the national air space of the Russian Federation. Nothing happened at that time. We did not make any comments, any statements. We were probably not quite happy, but that is what we inherited from the Cold War period. We could not, regretfully--we would love to--be fair to traditions and practices in one day. It will take decades--probably less, but it depends on the politicians. Naturally, those politicians should demonstrate more flexibility and readiness to use normal diplomatic working channels to discuss all those issues.
Thank you.