Thank you for the question.
We obviously had our boots filled with answers to the question you have just put to us during the consultation, and we recognize that Canada is a relatively small market. Therefore, Canadian industry can't be all things to all people across the military requirement--whether it be soldier system, aerospace, land, or naval systems. The value of the defence industrial strategy is to choose what capabilities are important for the country per defence environment and across environments--because there are many capabilities in defence electronic systems integration that are as applicable on the land side as they are to the air and sea side--and to figure out from across that industrial base of expertise what the key capabilities are that are going to serve to meet the national requirement and where there are market opportunities internationally.
The report we wrote attempted to clearly lay out that vision, if you like. It's that vision that we're looking to the government to adopt. We're happy to work in consultation to populate that defence industrial strategy with the capabilities that the government identifies to be of importance for sovereign reasons or security reasons or economic reasons. They will differ, depending on the defence domain they're being applied to.
I would just encourage you not to lose sight of those capabilities that cross platforms--that are used in an armoured vehicle but when slightly modified can also be used in a modern warfighter or in a modern naval vessel.