The short answer is that I don't know, because I don't know whether there is a “military solution” to it. I say instead that we'll probably have to go back to basics—we, together with our allies—to find whether there is not a better way to structure our national effort and international effort in concert. What I'm alluding to most certainly is that there appears to be some sort of hesitation as to the efficacy of our intelligence apparatus. That's where I would start, first and foremost.
We can spend an extraordinary amount of resources, automated and human resources and so on. Unless we get good, timely, effective intelligence and we can share some—and I'm not so sure that we do yet; I'm not so sure we have found the key, have found the formula for it. That's not a criticism; I'm just saying it's there. They are becoming more sophisticated and more dependent upon technology and better able to go across borders and to seep across sea and air lanes and so on. So intelligence is first and foremost. And not only the cooperation, but the meshing in of intelligence, the constabulary police, and the military may give rise to a new creation, a new formation, a new organization to deal with this. I don't think we're there yet.