Following on from that, because the UN has no capacity for calling on member states, if there's a non-classical blue beret operation such as Afghanistan, they can talk and they can pass resolutions, but they're going to have to turn to somebody like NATO if they want an instrument to do that.
Obviously, it's hard to say what's coming down the road, but with respect to the “responsibility to protect” doctrine, which the UN adopted—it was a Canadian initiative, and so on, and that's all great—how does that interact with traditional peacekeeping, and where do we go from here?
Where does the UN go from here? Do they have to accept the reality that two-thirds of their member states are dictatorships? Probably the way the UN has operated in the past hasn't worked, and where do they go from here? It impacts Canada, obviously.