Could you explain to us how the rules of engagement are determined? When the UN offers a country or NATO a subcontracting agreement, is the rules of engagement issue...
Earlier, you said that you had wilfully disobeyed an order. I do not blame you for doing so, as bringing along missile launchers but not the missiles does not seem to be a good idea. Should the other side realize that you are bluffing, the situation could turn ugly.
When the UN concludes subcontracting agreements with NATO or a country, which side determines the rules of engagement? Having spoken to a number of military people about several theatres of peacekeeping operations, I got the impression that the difficult task of determining the rules of engagement is left to each of the nations participating in the theatre of operations. Another issue to consider is that of caveats.
Could you tell us a little bit about the rules of engagement, about who sets them? Does the participation of some 30 countries with different caveats not make commanding the mission extremely difficult?