You talked about the UN subcontracting, and so on. The simple fact is, who would the UN turn to if they didn't turn to somebody to subcontract with, whether it's an organization such as NATO or individual countries? The other one you mentioned is that it's better to subcontract to a single country. I would suggest that there are a limited number of countries that could take on those kinds of missions—obviously the U.S., Canada, Britain, and a number of others, but that number is relatively small. They would wind up subcontracting, I think, to other willing partners. Would you not see that?
On June 17th, 2010. See this statement in context.