Well, Mr. Chairman, he has a motion. We're not going to roll over on this motion. It makes no sense. If we are dealing with procurement processes in the Canadian Forces, it makes no sense to not have, at the same time as somebody who has opinions—and they're his, and that's fine, and he may have written a book, and that's fine.... I've read his book. It's interesting. It makes no sense to not have the current person in charge of that job here at the same time, so that what one said and what the other said is fresh in everybody's minds. The committee can decide who's right and who's wrong. That's fine.
I suspect we will probably wind up having differing opinions, which is to be expected. It makes no sense to us not to do that at the same time—an hour with the old guy, an hour with the current guy—and then move on.
To give one man a bully pulpit for two hours...? I'm sorry, that is playing a game, and it's very clear that this is what's happening here. We just cannot support that.