If you look at the agreement, there is in fact a dispute resolution clause and ways to get out that are frankly very well and very fairly stated. In other words, there are clauses that say that if you want to get out you have to pay your fair share. We paid $551 million in this.
If in fact we decide to get out of the program—which you don't have to do just because you don't buy the jet—we could. There is no link, so you could stay in the program and make it that you're not going to buy the jets. That might affect our costing, because everything is pro-rated between all the companies, and stuff like that.
There is one significant difference between the cancellation in 1993 and this, and that is, that cancellation was with a contractor in the private sector; this is a government-to-government relationship. I think before any government decides not to proceed, there are probably—this goes well beyond my capability to talk about, but they're obviously big people—little consequences here, because you will have made a commitment, by signing, to buy something government to government. Between now and then, there is nothing to preclude doing a competition, frankly.