The issue was sole-sourcing of the NATO flying training. I'll make my comment, and then I'll get to Denis Desautels' response to it.
There's probably nobody around more committed to trying to undertake competitive procurement than I am. Both this position and my previous one were as accountable for them. However, if there ever was an occasion when a non-competitive contract should have been followed or taken, it is in this particular case. Thanks to the innovativeness and creativity of industry, we have come up with a solution that has saved the taxpayer, as of today, $56 million, with a potential to increase very shortly to over $200 million. That's point number one.
Point number two: you should be aware that this initiative was undertaken in complete compliance with the trade agreement, which is the agreement on internal trade, as well as the government's contracting regulations. In terms of the agreement on internal trade, you could look at article 506.11(a) and you'd see 'unforeseeable urgency'--