That's the problem. We're asked to make a leap of faith here. We're told that we can't see them. Moreover, I am told that the documents that could be given to me would be virtually useless. Thank you very much. I was given documents, they are in front of me. I can see the height, length and size of the plane. I can find all that out by using a measuring tape. I don't like that attitude.
What we are seeking to find out as MPs, essentially, is whether or not we're getting our money's worth. If details are being hidden from us supposedly because of some secret classification, I don't like that. I hope that other witnesses who will appear before us, the representatives from Boeing or Eurofighter, will explain their simulations to us. That might force Lockheed Martin to reveal its own. If Boeing and Eurofighter tell us that in their simulation they are capable of beating the F-35 in various scenarios, I hope that Lockheed Martin will show us its own scenarios demonstrating that they beat them in other situations. I think it's important for us to know that.
Moreover, in your opinion, would there be costs involved if we were to withdraw from the MOU? The minister seemed to be saying that if we withdrew from the MOU, it would probably cost us an awful lot of money. In your opinion, would there be costs if we decided to withdraw from the MOU?