I don't disagree with the philosophy expressed, but the simple fact is that all those people, as good and well-meaning and sincere and so on as they are, don't have to deal with some of the realities that the government has to deal with. Some of that is reflected back in this report, which any government would do.
The committee is obviously free to disagree. That's what committees can do. The form it takes obviously is up to the committee. But I think a year down the road or whatever, for the things that are in here, it would make sense to go back and call whoever in to say, “Okay, what have we done; have we made progress here, here, and here, and if not, why not?”