Well, that doesn't quite answer my question. My question is, do you agree that this, as an industrial strategy, would fit with your concepts of what at least one option is for the kind of industrial strategy that might happen? It seems to me, at least, from the numbers you gave out of a cost of $168 million to the Canadian government that produced $355 million in contract work.... Whether the actual return to the government was $168 million is another matter, but I'm sure there are people who could work out the numbers for industrial spinoffs and taxes and other benefits.
But in terms of an industrial strategy, if it were for that purpose only, would it be a success? And is that a model, as an industrial strategy, that meets your needs, or do you want something more specific, whereby it's not simply a matter of companies competing for work? For example, the government keeps talking about the possibility, at least, of $12 billion worth of work being available for competition by Canada and—though they don't say this—every other industrial country that's participating in this particular project. Is that particular model one you would advance as a model for the defence industry?